Jouaram_steam

1 hour ago, RevoltPlays said:

This works pretty reliably and consistently. I have a clip of me doing it like 4 times within a 1 minute I can dm you. I just didn't want to upload a long clip to youtube

@Jouaram

All good, since it's a fence issue I can fix it ty

16 hours ago, Mikerophonez said:

[I shot a staff member while he was invincible and he said it was ardm, then proceeded to say "okay you are free to go" then banned me, I don't know if he had the wrong steam id posted or something but I should not have been banned]

The logs do not match up with 'i shot a staff member' it appears you got let out of the sit and then went and MRDM'd as a Dwarf. 

If you believe this to be incorrect you can re-appeal but without proof it will likely not go in your favor. I would only suggest remaking the appeal if you have clips available that prove your innocence. 

This is what I see for most recent kills before the ban, was this the MRDM? @MidgetNipples

ACCEPTED

I have seen you on the server a few times whether it's through spectate or running across you and I think you're a fun player who doesn't have ill intent, as long as you're able to focus and put effort in to staffing you should do good. Good luck and show us what you can do - be sure to wait for your Mentor's message and plan before taking sits!

Your assigned Mentor is: @RevoltPlays

Be sure to click on and read all links below before taking a sit - keep an eye out for a ping in #rookie-barracks on Discord for further information. 

Staff Handbook Link

Punishment Guidelines Link

T-Mod Initiation Sheet (MUST READ)

ACCEPTED

I haven't interacted with you much however you have managed to gain a lot of positive Community Feedback and earned yourself a shot at T-Mod to let us see what you're capable of. Good luck and be sure to wait for your Mentor before you begin to take sits. 

Your assigned Mentor is: @Dreadnaught

Be sure to click on and read all links below before taking a sit - keep an eye out for a ping in #rookie-barracks on Discord for further information. 

Staff Handbook Link

Punishment Guidelines Link

T-Mod Initiation Sheet (MUST READ)

Warn removed.

I can see it was definitely an accident, I am waiting for Midget to respond just in-case this wasn't the scenario the warn is related to but if it is your warn will most likely be removed.

I would call it Dwarf Leader or something to avoid confusion when referencing the Mayor and to not cause any issues rule-wise but it would definitely be a fun job to add and could include the agenda for all dwarves to see so they can be better coordinated and hopefully less homeless and smelly. Thanks for the suggestion.

It seems a bit of a weird way to do it but I agree with a purge area/PvP area, I will put this as accepted for the general idea but not exactly how it'd be implemented. 

I think this could be a funny job if it was restricted to the camera swep + lockpick only disallowing them from damaging players and only doing their set objective. 

This is the sort of thing that lets me get a bit more creative so I'd enjoy making this, I will add it to the list. Thanks for the suggestion.

Accumulating hits is a decent idea although wouldn't work with the current system and would require a lot of reworking. 

The second idea about double crossing would be okay but rarely ever used as 80% of hits are usually randomized which wouldn't be double cross-able. 

I think overall this didn't gain enough attention for me to consider tweaking it and I don't think it would make much impact or difference. Thanks for the suggestion.

I don't get it, I am convinced the +1's where bribed. The video where he says my name is mud does not sound like it'd work as a swep its very quiet and covered by music, if you manage to get a clip that could be used this could be considered but it's still very.. weird O_o - Thanks for the suggestion, denied.

Amazing idea from a well known minge, what a nice surprise. This will be worked on, thanks for the suggestion.

This didn't get much feedback, try reposting this in the future if you still want changes made. I do not feel like these changes are warranted if it didnt catch anybodys attention.

The NPC additions is a possibility if players are struggling to find the one in spawn however I haven't seen that as much of an issue yet. 

The jackhammer could be a temporary crafted item that breaks after certain uses but farms crazy fast, I think something like that to spice up miner wouldn't be terrible. 

As this is two suggestions in one I am going to deny it but I will add the jackhammer to the list to look into. Thanks for the suggestion.

You can buy Aether-Bucks on the store and then buy the boosts in-game, I prefer a less cluttered Store where possible. A boost all option in-game would not be a bad idea though.

Thanks for the suggestion. 

Allowing raiders to return would lead to a friend playing super safe for 3 minutes then tagging their friend in, repeating infinite times until the raid timer is hit. 

This is a boring, unhealthy playstyle and should not be encouraged - raiders get the benefit of risking nothing whilst basers risk everything they've bought/upgraded which is why it leans in the basers favor. 

Basers coming back after a short time encourages raiders to push through as fast as they can which is not a bad thing, I personally do not think this needs to be changed but if you still think it should repost and gain more responses for it to be considered. Thanks for the suggestion.

I have actually been testing with this job, it would be forced to its K9 swep similar to cat/goat with a bite that stuns similar to nightstick and a contraband scanner sniff. 

Thanks for the suggestion, expect this to be added by the next gameplay update. 

I was testing around with this and I don't really like the idea of a whole section/island being Premium only, I will test around with the respawn rates to see what feels fair but not sloggish-ly long. 

Thanks for the suggestion.

Raiding and basing is a controversial topic. 

Basing being strong benefits majority of players who want to earn money, which is a lot of the players. Of course it'd be boring if they had no risk when basing which is why the raiding tools available are there with more being added - the basing rules should not be restricted in favor of more tools being added. 

Many raiders who actually try and are skilled do manage to raid bases often and with the raid stick being available it can usually end up worth it for the raiders. Bases can look scary with the zig-zag and one-way meta but it's definitely possible if you use more than just a gun when raiding, think nades and positionals like thermites. 

I am a strong believer that effort should have to be put in to have a successful raid, on ret raiding was way too fair and resulted in less-skilled players never being able to base due to dying every base defense and losing all their entities. Of course this made raiders happier but generally that's a smaller portion of the playerbase (which I am still trying to appeal to but without it being a free raid every time). 

Raiders can come back every 20 minutes and learn the base they're raiding, eventually it should result in a successful raid and by that time the raid stick value would have increased to a point where it's worth it for the raider.

This suggestion is denied but the idea is always kept in my head and is constantly trying to be balanced in a way that fits my agenda stated above. Thanks for the suggestion.

I will work on getting sell all buttons for each individual ore/ingot. 

Currently it is a bit iffy but players have gotten used to it, I am still going to add it. Thanks for the suggestion. 

Dropped ores are kept limited for performance reasons. Sorry but suggestion denied.

I agree with a system that allows players to trade AB for cash and vice-versa through an NPC. 

This has been on my mind for a while as it could become very beneficial for the economy going forward. 

Thanks for the suggestion, added to the list.

A delay between withdrawals makes sense but they'll just leave their last withdrawal for when they're about to be raided and have the same result. 

I will have it added just to help counter the problem but this wont fully fix it. 

19 hours ago, Andrew said:

TLDR; Tango needs to warn or give options before deleting players stuff.

I fully agree with this but given the context I don't think Tango needs any sort of punishment for this situation specifically, it will be documented in-case something like this pops up again then the appropriate action can be taken. @TangoDownI get you were trying to help out the cop that wanted to go inside of PD but given it was low-pop hours and nobody had complained prior bringing the player and asking them to remove it is the better cause of action unless it's disrupting gameplay such as a PD raid in which case you could remove a wall or two to make an entrance for raiders. If they refuse to remove it when its illegal then you've given them the fair chance and can go ahead and remove it yourself. 

I make it a point at Staff meetings to mention not instantly using commands on players or their builds when it can be avoided, this is a good example of that. 

Thanks for the report and sorry about your build, in future you should definitely be a cop when building a 'test' base in PD to avoid any issues.