Jouaram_steam

I am denying this suggestion for Wardrobe specifically, playermodel related stuff will come eventually. 

Thanks for the suggestion.

14 minutes ago, BigSexyJanet said:

60 seconds even for 26k aint worth the time

2 labs at 60 seconds per 26k, without boost its about 3.12m an hour and with boost 6.24m an hour - compared to the others jobs it is not bad at all, slap some printers down and you'll be doing pretty good. 

Making 15-25m an hour by 'renting' labs (AKA encouraging people sitting on the job not using it being fully AFK) was and is unhealthy for the server as a whole and completely unintentional. 

12 hours ago, wiggy but less cool said:

Make how many printers they have a exponential thing so if they have x amount of printers they get even more hour.

Thats exactly how it works

I've looked into this and am finding a way to restrict the player opening f4 menu until they've fully loaded to avoid players accidentally breaking their game, thanks for the bug report.

Some of the models are missing bones that the knives are referencing, I'll have to put them in a generic spot such as the chest/back to fix - if you think players would want this feel free to make a suggestion. 

I believe this has been explained fully and is resolved.

I've had discussion with astro and other Staff, there was a bit of back and forth between you which you own up to and have validated the first few kills however it has become evident that there were at least 2 kills that were 100% unprovoked RDM, as the others are grey area and can't be proven as RDM or not RDM I will only be enforcing the RDMx2. 

Astro has received a 2 day ban due to the 2xRDM and PW. Thanks for the complaint. 

9 minutes ago, Triskele said:

So in any situation moving forward, there's no damage requirement to constitute self-defense? In my humble opinion that opens up a lot of options for kill baiting by saying "he shot in my general direction so i killed him" even if the shooter wasn't trying to kill said player.

I did state that they require damage before retaliating unless they're confident they can provide a clip that shows them being shot at. Staff will use their own judgement to decide if they were being shot at or not and if it warranted retaliation. 

@RevoltPlaysis correct in saying he can kill you if you either admit to shooting at him or if the victim had a clip of you shooting at them, the only reason damage is required is for scenarios where neither is admitting to it and there is no clip as there would be no logs of it.

Shooting at a player is threatening their life/endangering them which can be retaliated on however if the person you're shooting doesn't have a clip of you shooting at them they'll get punished with RDM, so if they can't clip they need to wait until they get damaged.

I do think Revolt returned you super fast and didn't explain WHY he was allowed to kill you which is probably why you were left confused and made this complaint. 

I will let Revolt respond just in-case he wants to add anything but that's about all there is to it from my view.

This was an issue with misreading the names which were similar, I have spoken to Creed and this shouldn't happen again.

Your warn has been removed, thanks for the appeal!

Completed

ACCEPTED

You are one of the rare gems in Garry's Mod with you being calm, laid back and mature. I think it's a no brainer to give you a shot at Staffing an hope you enjoy it enough to stick around, I have not heard of any negative experiences you've caused or been a part of which is rare with how much activity you have. 

Good luck!

Your assigned Mentor is: @Novva

Be sure to click on and read all links below before taking a sit - keep an eye out for a ping in #rookie-barracks on Discord for further information. 

Staff Handbook Link

Punishment Guidelines Link

T-Mod Initiation Sheet (MUST READ)

ACCEPTED

You have shown to be a very active member of the Community and many if not all regular players know your name by now and have interacted with you in some form; I believe you have decent characteristics for Staffing but may need to improve on some of the personality based issues before completing your T-Mod phase (Like getting cheap deals for candy on new players, the principal of it makes you look bad) - luckily these types of things are fixable and hopefully now that it's been mentioned and you have been given a shot improvements can be made. 

Good luck!

Your assigned Mentor is: @RevoltPlays

Be sure to click on and read all links below before taking a sit - keep an eye out for a ping in #rookie-barracks on Discord for further information. 

Staff Handbook Link

Punishment Guidelines Link

T-Mod Initiation Sheet (MUST READ)

What GoldFishie is saying is correct, however Emily has already resolved it and removed the warn - this is very lenient and forgiving of Emily so don't take it for granted and make sure you understand what Fishie said above to avoid this happening again.

GoldFishie answered your question and your appeal doesn't have anything else to it, I hope this resolved your concerns. 

I can see how from Graphic's view it sounded like the printers got blown up out of fear of the raid being successful, if that was the case it'd definitely be unfair and is against the rules (This will be specified better in the rules after this reading this thread). 

The video has proved it was 100% accidental anyways so with it being against or not against the rules doesn't really matter, your warn has been removed. 

Thanks for the appeal. 

I think this was a valid situation handled with incorrect commands used and incorrect punishments given. 

The mic spam claim is a genuine concern which should've been discussed between all 3 of you and a compromise made, whether it be directing them to the Forums for a complaint or explaining leniency at night/when the server is low pop. 

The NLR itself seems veeeery nitpicky and not really why NLR exists or how we should be enforcing rules, it does look like petty-ness being used due to Slimey's complaint about the mic-spam. I also see nexus called it a petty NLR warn which makes it feel even more wrong.

After Slimey came back if he continued doing negative actions I would've told him that you don't want him to keep bothering you for no gain to themselves at which point they should respect that and leave or risk a low-end harassment punishment. 

On the other hand @Slimey Head it's also never really productive to try and enforce rules on Staff members, you should've posted a report just like the one you had here but for mic-spam so we could let you know about leniency at night when the server is low pop and how mic-spam is not too harshly enforced if its inside of a non-mobile building that you can just walk away from.

The server did only have 18 players online with a good handful of AFKs therefore it's not very chaotic and Staff are usually more lenient on players at this time especially with builds, I think the build was 100% okay and the mic spam seemed fine if it was handled differently once a player (slimey or anyone else) complained about it. 

To conclude, I do not think either party needs punishment in this scenario but it could've been handled better and hopefully will be in the future.

Your warn has been removed, thanks for the appeal. @Slimey Head

Completed

Worst appeal EVER.

Sorted

My only concern with this is that it messes with a lot of players muscle memory, I know how and would have done this if I believed majority would prefer it. 

I'll wait and see how the responses are, it would be neater for sure but things will be in places players aren't used to so the first few looks at tools might be off-putting/weird. 

This was already the intention but something is clashing with the limits of things and as a result when enabled lights can be spawned infinitely. 

Once that issue is fixed they'll be re-enabled. 

Thanks for the suggestion!

22 hours ago, TangoDown said:

The question is regardless of how the base is set up are players allowed to build to try and bypass a gap or feature of the base they are raiding before they start raiding, Assuming that they are not building directly on base of the person they are raiding.

Anywhere they build that affects your base should be IN your base as you can only build inside your base which means they cannot build there.

Leaving this suggestion up for discussion until the Halloween event is over as it's a good time to test how players react to weird/custom models.

The main reason I want feedback here is to see if players like or dislike custom models.

Leaving this suggestion up for discussion until the Halloween event is over as it's a good time to test how players react to weird/custom models.

As a side note Wardrobe is outdated and broken, Outfitter is the only one that functions but it does have issues in itself. 

The main reason I want feedback here is to see if players like or dislike custom models and would prefer to use my own renting system for models instead of either of the wardrobe or outfitter alternatives.