Jouaram_steam

I can see how from Graphic's view it sounded like the printers got blown up out of fear of the raid being successful, if that was the case it'd definitely be unfair and is against the rules (This will be specified better in the rules after this reading this thread). 

The video has proved it was 100% accidental anyways so with it being against or not against the rules doesn't really matter, your warn has been removed. 

Thanks for the appeal. 

I think this was a valid situation handled with incorrect commands used and incorrect punishments given. 

The mic spam claim is a genuine concern which should've been discussed between all 3 of you and a compromise made, whether it be directing them to the Forums for a complaint or explaining leniency at night/when the server is low pop. 

The NLR itself seems veeeery nitpicky and not really why NLR exists or how we should be enforcing rules, it does look like petty-ness being used due to Slimey's complaint about the mic-spam. I also see nexus called it a petty NLR warn which makes it feel even more wrong.

After Slimey came back if he continued doing negative actions I would've told him that you don't want him to keep bothering you for no gain to themselves at which point they should respect that and leave or risk a low-end harassment punishment. 

On the other hand @Slimey Head it's also never really productive to try and enforce rules on Staff members, you should've posted a report just like the one you had here but for mic-spam so we could let you know about leniency at night when the server is low pop and how mic-spam is not too harshly enforced if its inside of a non-mobile building that you can just walk away from.

The server did only have 18 players online with a good handful of AFKs therefore it's not very chaotic and Staff are usually more lenient on players at this time especially with builds, I think the build was 100% okay and the mic spam seemed fine if it was handled differently once a player (slimey or anyone else) complained about it. 

To conclude, I do not think either party needs punishment in this scenario but it could've been handled better and hopefully will be in the future.

Your warn has been removed, thanks for the appeal. @Slimey Head

It was a good length, gave everybody a fair chance and lots of space between the jumps so nobody got cluttered/stuck. 

Decent Event that I'm sure more will be interested in, the only critique is I would probably have 1st, 2nd and 3rd as winners just to keep it going for a few minutes more. 

Completed

Worst appeal EVER.

Sorted

My only concern with this is that it messes with a lot of players muscle memory, I know how and would have done this if I believed majority would prefer it. 

I'll wait and see how the responses are, it would be neater for sure but things will be in places players aren't used to so the first few looks at tools might be off-putting/weird. 

This was already the intention but something is clashing with the limits of things and as a result when enabled lights can be spawned infinitely. 

Once that issue is fixed they'll be re-enabled. 

Thanks for the suggestion!

22 hours ago, TangoDown said:

The question is regardless of how the base is set up are players allowed to build to try and bypass a gap or feature of the base they are raiding before they start raiding, Assuming that they are not building directly on base of the person they are raiding.

Anywhere they build that affects your base should be IN your base as you can only build inside your base which means they cannot build there.

I was actually trying to make it bigger in your hands instead of smaller on the body, it's an oversized chainsaw! 

Either way, body perm is not being reduced in size if you want your sword to show get rid of your chainsaw flexing every body perm at once would be impossible. 

Leaving this suggestion up for discussion until the Halloween event is over as it's a good time to test how players react to weird/custom models.

The main reason I want feedback here is to see if players like or dislike custom models.

I will play around with some mining addons for the next gameplay update but if they're as gross as I remember they may not be included. 

Thanks for the suggestion.

Leaving this suggestion up for discussion until the Halloween event is over as it's a good time to test how players react to weird/custom models.

As a side note Wardrobe is outdated and broken, Outfitter is the only one that functions but it does have issues in itself. 

The main reason I want feedback here is to see if players like or dislike custom models and would prefer to use my own renting system for models instead of either of the wardrobe or outfitter alternatives. 

It makes sense however compensating for server crashes and stuff is going to be tricky to tackle code-wise, I will look into it and see what results can be made. 

Added to the list, thanks for the suggestion. 

I can place some lower-priced tables but I doubt they will get used much. 

Maybe 1 cheaper roulette table. 

Thanks for the suggestion.

The punishments fits, you were being a minge and refusing to listen to Staff and are trying to present it in a way where you were treated unfairly - it hasn't worked and it's very obvious who was at fault. 

It's also probably good habit to not place down the text-screen you just got warned to not place down again even if its to 'see it better' you and everyone else can edit it just fine in the Q menu. 

Report denied.

1 hour ago, RevoltPlays said:

I am going with a 100% +1 for unban after reading through logs.

Danny was killed by Onion during this interaction

Just 9 seconds before this happened Danny was one of the players telling him to do it.

I went through the logs and he didn't bring Onion to a sit or do anything of the sort to let him explain anything.

I went all the way through the chat logs and everyone was making jokes about it and not a single sit was made.

This almost looks like ban baiting to me. I'm very confused as to why he was banned if no sits were made and everyone was just having a laugh, not to mention the person that banned him told him to do it.

@Danny_McflurryI would like for you to write to me in DMs why he was banned as this really does look weird so I can come to a conclusion, if somebody has Staff giving them the okay then the Staff members takes the responsibility of their actions - what happened here lies on you and not him if logs are correct. 

Onion has been unbanned, if logs are proven to be wrong or out of context the ban may be re-instated. 

I think it's evident what was done here warranted your ban, in future try and have some more awareness of the people you interact with so you don't go ruining other players days and making them upset. Stay in your lane and avoid bothering others, go farm printers or something if you can't be civil. 

Appeal denied.

Other players cannot build props in or on your base so if they do that during or before and then start a raid I'd call it a fail-raid as they used something illegal to gain an advantage however if they NEED to build to get up your stairs then you yourself might have a fail-base. 

Sorted, thanks for the support!

Sorted! Thanks for the support.

You got warned for wasting staff time/fake sits, even though it's a joke to you sits get very stacked up and it's stressful for *volunteer* Staff members to have to deal with, therefore the rule and punishment is in place to avoid these scenarios. 

In future if you and your friend want to kill each-other do not get Staff involved. 

What makes you think it's the reward menu doing it?

This ban is likely expired or expiring, I can't gather much information from the post to be honest. If this is unresolved remake it with the template.

It's pretty RNG, every 60 seconds seconds it has a 50% chance to spawn a pumpkin near one player. 

I halved the timer and increased the chance to 75% which should result in a lot more pumpkins being seen and smashed.