GoldFish

+1

-1

17 hours ago, ChaseOuyy said:

+/-

Now this might be a huge flaw with the update. Stealing other peoples resources and no logs for it? Yikes...
In my general thoughts on this I mean if what you are saying is true, this should be appealed. But I guess a bit more information will surface.

HUGE flaw with update because it didn't show a guy stealing your stuff? 😂

After a good look at logs it looks like Bozo was attacked by Pointerz after being kicked from the party for whatever reason.  Bozo then retaliated killing Pointerz and destroying the printers.

Good communication between yourself and Amanita could've avoided a ban if you just better explained your side

Your ban has been lifted feel free to join.

Ban expired I believe

Oh haha I get it! It's because your names Joe nuts! Haha that's a real knee slapper

14 hours ago, TangoDown said:

I understand not every situation can be covered and have a rule made for it and I'm not advocating to have a million rules for every situation. it would be impossible and cause the server to be no fun.

 

But in the case of what I'm suggesting here I wouldn't say it needs to specify pedophilia  but something like.

I happen to see another name today making a joke about rape. So it doesn't seem to be a well enforced rule. But even if the rule doesn't get changed I at least hope that this brings a little more attention to the matter and staff will start looking at names a little closer. If either of these happens its a win.

 

I see no reason to add names to it since it literally says to keep it out of the game. I'm also curious on what names you're seeing that bring you offence.

The server is gonna have a 20 page manual soon with all these rules that get added.

2 hours ago, Fanman said:

whats a BLKBEARD extenstion

When it says "Ext. for (person)" that means a staff member didn't have the power to ban somebody for a desired length and a higher up had to reban to get the correct punishment time. And saying who the extension is for helps staff keep track of who came up with the punishment and should be in question if a ban was janky.

Emily seems quick to wanna drop this warn so this back and forth doesn't have to continue. Although I'm not so set on the warn being removed.

From what I've heard / seen you left immediately after dying in the raid. Sure RL stuff happens that causes people to leave mid raid but the timing on you leaving RIGHT after you got killed is no good.

And while people leaving mid raid isn't a problem in itself it's when people reconnect either instantly or a *short* while later that leads to the belief they left to avoid the taking of raidables and whatnot.

A short time of 20 minutes for you to have to supposedly shut down everything just to do school work and join right back up is sussy.

You've got plenty of money and I see no reason why you'd actually be upset by somebody taking a little bit worth so I'm willing to believe it was accidental.

Even with that next time you HAVE to leave the game mid raid please do not reconnect for at least an hour or so to avoid any confusion.

ALSO with it being a VW I see no reason for it to be removed since the point of a VW are just to let other staff know to watch out for that behavior and it actually has no consequences against you unless you repeat the behavior.

Who?

2 hours ago, DeniTheSwaggiestJit said:

I'm not "already saying" that at all. You're getting the wrong idea and putting words in my mouth, I'm all for no warns at all if the idea would ever be put into place but then I thought about it some more, people tend to make simple mistakes, it's human nature. Let me give you 1 or 2 scenarios. Let's say for example I pd raid except I missclick and don't click my raid bind, I proceed through the raid without ever adverting it thinking I didn't break any rules. After the raid is over I get pulled into a sit thinking "what'd I do wrong" and they warn me for fail rp. In that situation I get a warn for a genuine mistake. Without the 1-2 warn wiggle room I'd get perma banned for a simple mistake. Another example could be if there was a new rule added or an old rule that was tweaked for example "Only 1 keypad allowed in bases" (not an actual rule, i dont think) and I had like 3, then I get pulled into a sit and warned for like idek what i'd get warned for, fail rp or something. I hope reading this you understand why the wiggle room is there. It is NOT to "go back to being the Deni everybody knows" but so that it could prevent me from getting perma banned for a simple mistake. (Also if this does actually happen somehow I'd plan on getting zero warns).

... Deni if you're not willing to read through the MOTD once or twice then you really have no need returning the server. You've been warned for pretty much everything there is a rule for. You should know what to do and what not.

19 hours ago, DeniTheSwaggiestJit said:

during my first month back i can only get like 2 warns

Bruh why do you have to give yourself wiggle room for 2 warns when plenty of people can live out their playtime on the server with 0?

Like you're already saying you're not gonna follow the rules and just go back to being Deni everybody knows which is what got you banned.

Sorry Deni but you had SOOOOOOOO many chances and you knew that the perm was coming for the longest time. Yet you still decided to flaunt and break rules even with that knowledge.

I feel you need to wait a while longer before coming back to the server.

-1

I've talked to Doggo about how to deal with situations better in the future then what was seen in the clips. And further punishment will be decided by Jouaram.

The warn on Banana has been removed since I find it to be invalid and there's no reason for it.

I've talked to both people on how things could go different to have a better time on the server.

@Canadian Maple Do you happen to have video of all this?

I'd really like to see the time between Milk being asked to get let out, calling raid and Maple moving Milk out.

Alright this has been handled

Also welcome back bb gurl

On 9/12/2021 at 2:30 PM, RevoltPlays said:

If they don't want to RP it then they shouldn't be a lawyer

I meant more of people being jailed and being salty they can't just get bailed right away

18 hours ago, Jouaram said:

What about disabling bails whilst there is a player on the Lawyer job?

Meh because some people really don't wanna RP it also you have a short amount of time to be able to go through everything.

While I like this job it causes headaches and it very bad for performance which I believe is why it was removed from ret.

Soooo I doubt Jerry man will add it