Jouaram

scared

21 minutes ago, TasloLaslo said:

I have just tried it on a brand new account and was banned in the same fashion https://imgur.com/a/DfPuC6U is the account information 

For testing purposes I used the same phone number I did the first time 

Do you have any other Community discords (ones that have like 1k+ members/require phone verification) that you can join to see if you get banned as well? It doesn't appear to be a ban on our end and maybe Discord disallowing you to join servers like this/ours?

Can you try joining with a new acc and see if this happens again?

Warns for reference. 

Steam ID or profile link?

You have been interacting well on the server, as long as the previous issues don't repeat this should be no problem. Appeal accepted. 

Due to the context I am not going to apply a punishment here.

To be honest the demotion is valid but I do think LittleMister should expect players to get a little salty if you're specifically demoting for you to use the job, it looks abusive even though it technically isn't. There isn't a punishment needed here as it is a valid demotion if you are not actively using your job as long as this is enforced equally across the board with any and all bankers/bank guards being demoted if someone wants the job and they are not actively doing it for a period of time. 

I appreciate the report and understand your frustration as stated above but due to you being inactive/not doing the job for 26 minutes I see this as a fair demotion. 

Same issue/response as the other one, sorry.

I wanted to have this with the server originally but after testing it's not at all made for servers unfortunately, you experience heavy lag when re-doing lots of props at once (or an adv dupe) and can also be abused to undo/redo props to have them collide with eachother. I see no way this can be added although it's a neat feature. 

Many tools have been unrestricted for Premium+.

For now these have been disabled due to causing too many conflicts with other halo-based gimmicks in the game currently.

It was you and a friend sending them as you stated to intentionally push your hate onto me for a ban that you caused yourself. The appeal is denied.

2 minutes ago, Jouaram said:

Werent you the guy that sent me pictures of mutilated cats after I banned you?

Werent you the guy that sent me pictures of mutilated cats after I banned you?

Bloody hell

Top 10 things to post whilst arrested

See you Monika have a good time 

1 hour ago, Novva said:

I fully understand the point of this rule so that you are not shooting someone through a wall, the main reason I made this is the fact there was an open spot in the base why should I have to be looking at the person to be able to throw the grenade into there? I'm raiding the base I already know that someone is going to be in there. It is not unfair as you can hear the grenade and can move away.

The main reason the rule is there is to avoid things like pineapple nade spam, other strong weps that are considered nades or have grey areas about it. I am not sure how rule wording would go for something like this without causing issues with other sweps.

Is the suggestion to remove the rule? As it stands this is the base creators fault but you still wouldn't really be allowed to abuse it, for nades/rpg you need to be damageable and visible whilst shooting or throwing, you can peak and then go back to cover 

heya

whaat me? im never afk 

Ye it was fixed but new gmod update broke it, it'll be fixed soon ish

27 minutes ago, mayui said:

now u can focus on school u goober

mayui you are so kind and thoughtful

I think the ruling on this is fine now.