Ozyv2

-/+ might be server intensive.

Suggestion:

Whenever somebody is perm banned, have something that auto auctions randomly with randomized prices or even 4 of the top expensive ones would work? or 4 randomly selected items.

Link To Relevant Addons: [LINK]

Media/Screenshots/Videos: [SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS]

How will this improve the quality of Aether?: They're gone for good, why should their perms be?

Suggestion: Allow people to do !purgetime command where it shows the countdown until next purge, or allow a command to enable the UI at the top that usually shows the purge countdown.

Link To Relevant Addons: [LINK]

Media/Screenshots/Videos: [SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS]

How will this improve the quality of Aether?: I've been asked countless times how long has it been since last purge.

QoL Ozy here

Remove cigs

Suggestion: More craftable please

Link To Relevant Addons: [LINK]

Media/Screenshots/Videos: [SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS]

How will this improve the quality of Aether?: QoL for Miner and Lumberjack, maybe cosmetics you can make and sell or craft some fun usable items or sound sweps (i love sound sweps.) or a diverse amount of guns and gernades or interactive things idk just moar craf ty

3 minutes ago, ThiccYe said:

OZY HYPE 

will you re rank tho?

cf

After 3 long months, I now own a car, a full time job as a locksmith, and finally a place in which I live.

I pay 400~ a month and get utilis for free and have a kitchen and laundry on site and 1 roomate.

Overall doing well, along with having a lovely wife.

so now i guess i go back to being on gmod.

Sir April was 3 months ago

On 7/22/2022 at 4:04 AM, ThiccYe said:

+1

I think this used to be in the server? Last i saw was MoistCake using it 

^ it was +1

+1

Cool concept maybe something along the lines of how they do TF2 Trading Sites where the items that are bound to the website through steam id or something can be bought and etc. 

Play with the idea doesnt have to be an app

+1

Suggestion: Make the luxury crate items body perms, specifically the tree.

Link To Relevant Addons: [LINK]

Media/Screenshots/Videos:

How will this improve the quality of Aether?: I dont even need to explain

+1 I know it's on my pc somewhere but a couple months ago Oxx and I did an Anakin and General Grevious photo op, on the server for something and jman set the pm to be big for Oxx.

Didn't see the pm being used otherwise but it'll be rotated out if not used anyways so meh why not

3 minutes ago, Danny_Mcflurry said:

So you wasnt actively Basing or growing weed and had plans to continue watching stuff till someone said something, Responding to ozy There isnt anything wrong with the afk system as he wasnt actually afk he was actively not doing the job which is why we do it. Taking a break for 15 mins+ Means you shouldnt be on the job and let someone else do it

I disagree, I feel as though even if the player is rping or doing things not related to the job even if in high demand but has plans of using it in the future then they hold every right to hold onto said job as long as they are not away from their keyboard which it seems like he wasn't. 

+1

1 minute ago, Danny_Mcflurry said:

This needs to stop now, Yes She was given Permission To, It has been a thing for a long time just never written down. Why would it make sense for you to be able to only be the job to sell it or just sit around? 

If someone is on weed Grower but not using it constantly , even hann said 10 minutes or 15. So if they try to rp or something they should just become citizen? That doesn't sound right

1 minute ago, UnclearCrowd said:

They dont have to be afk to not actively be using it. 

Once again if there is an issue with the afk system then fix that instead of having staff do things like this which lead to this if the intentions is to demote people off of jobs they aren't using all the time when they wanna rp for a bit then add that to the system until then, let people do as they want.

Just now, UnclearCrowd said:

Its not really fair to call the whole commjnity bias torwards hann, its just that everyone wants that job and if someone is actively not using it the community thinks its unfair to adk at the job. Im going by the fact that hann told everyone that she was given the okay to demote and no one has stepped in and said "thats wrong you were not given permission". If you were to warn hann here you would need to warn everyone who told her it was okay. She gave him the right amount of warning. 

I prefaced nobody should be warned, and that the replies I read where biased in my humble opinion as in which is to be expected when a figure of the community.

I also belive it shouldn't be up to the staff to demote people from their job if they deem them not using it as it defeats the entire point of the anti-afk system, and if there is an issue with the afk system then don't make it up to staff, fix your own system where things like this won't happen imo

4 minutes ago, hann said:

As I had stated in an earlier reply, I had been speaking with both Danny and ThiccYe regarding players holding jobs whilst not actively making money. I was given the okay to demote players who are obviously not using it. The job only allows 6 players to use it at a time, and with a chat full of players who are trying to try to use it for the first time or use it to actually make money, it seems fair to demote players who are just sitting watching tv and not using the job for 10 to 15 minutes. This was not an attempt to abuse my powers, obviously. I have recieved the okay from multiple higher-ups that the demotion was valid. There was absolutely no bias. I will express this again, as I have already stated many, many times before. It is not fair to hold a job that you are not actively using when it is in such a high demand. 

Do you see me flying around looking for players AFK on Weed Grower? No. I was sitting in my base and was notified of the situation.

And if you actually watch the video and look in the bottom left, I was already using the Weed Grower job at the time so how that is 'using my power for my own greed and pursuit of wealth' is beyond me. 

Sorry but I don't think you actually listened or looked at any of the evidence provided.

I pointed out (for her friends) as well. And again, the anti-afk system, and once again if this had happened to myself or another player I'm sure I would make a report and they would to. Whether you had the ok from other staff when this rule isn't implemented and furthermore if he was going to use it soon, or if he was going to sell or give it to a friend? Overall still unmoved and it is clear to me that you are not taking the player whomst you've affected to heart.

 In many scenarios players can be holding onto the job for a friend using the switchjob command, selling the job for lucrative gain as its a high demand job,  whether they are using it or not doesn't determine wether you are allowed to force them out of it as that is the Anti-Afk systems job. To me it seems hann was going out of their way to see if any were not at their keyboard in pursuit of a slot on the job. I can't help but say I'm slightly disappointed that the community is taking a somewhat biased stance as if this happened to any one of you, you'd be upset or angered the same way which would heavily impact aethers playerbase as the staff in particular are suppose to only moderate the server in a way that ensures every players experience is in their heart.

Do I think moving forward jouaram needs to talk with staff and make sure everyone has their heads on straight and not using their powers for their own greed or pursuit of wealth? (Even for friends)Yes.

Do I think that this warrants a warn? No.

Do i think hann had malicious intent, a toss up. She probably wanted a weed spot (for herself or friend) and looked for someone which already leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Do I think the community took the wrong stance. Yes 

Do I think that there is bias in these replies yes.

8 hours ago, Trem0r said:

This was not a ban from today, this is a 2 day ban that was issued on 7/15/2022 at 22:41. 

You were walking up to players and just asking yes or no and if they said the wrong answer you killed them, this is not allowed because the player had no information about the result of what would happen and you did not give any kind of context that it would result in them being killed, making it RDM.

 

-1

 

       Even if the player had known the full repercussions and played your game willingly, if no video evidence is shown then you will be punished still accordingly. 

       I suggest using GeForce Experience, MedalTV, or OBS.

       I also suggest hosting your questions as opposed to out and about rather inside of a base with a kos sign in which you'd be allowed to kill them.

-♤

@Danny_Mcflurry

Where to begin

       It's been prefaced before that even if you didn't mean to kill somebody that it is still a "Random Deathmatch" which is still holding true to the description, you initiated intentionally or not by throwing a grenade in a public place which deals damage and in my eyes if you had PW and such then this is justified.

       Be more mindful of whom you are around when deciding to throw grenades at around as it may land you in water that you didn't want to be around.

       As the saying goes, don't play with explosives.

-♤

More context, plus a clip, and @Trem0r